Smart Design For Hot/Humid Climates - Architect Peter L Pfeiffer, FAIA Part 1 of 2


SUMMARY

The speaker discusses the origins of green building in Austin during the 1980s, including energy conservation, water use, and the Austin Green Building Program.

IDEAS:

  • Austin’s early 1980s energy initiatives led to the national Energy Star program.
  • Energy conservation was cheaper than building new power plants in Austin.
  • Austin’s green building program focused on reducing landfill waste from construction.
  • The term “green building” originated from Austin’s eco-friendly initiatives.
  • Austin’s green building program predates the USGBC’s LEED certification.
  • The program adjusts incentives based on effectiveness in conserving resources.
  • Green building principles include reduced consumption, improved health, and less environmental impact.
  • Remodeling existing structures is more eco-friendly than new construction.
  • The energy conservation pyramid prioritizes design over expensive technology.
  • Basic energy-saving measures are often more cost-effective than high-tech solutions.
  • Solar panels may not be as effective as simpler energy-saving designs.
  • The speaker’s own home exemplifies practical green building strategies.
  • Maintenance and longevity of green technologies are important considerations.
  • Educating clients on energy-efficient design choices is crucial for architects.
  • Choosing a home’s orientation can significantly impact energy efficiency.
  • Donating deconstructed materials to charities can provide tax benefits.
  • Two-story homes can be more energy-efficient than single-story expansions.
  • Reasonable ceiling heights can reduce the volume of air needing conditioning.

INSIGHTS:

  • Early green initiatives in Austin sparked a nationwide energy efficiency movement.
  • Cost-effective energy conservation can outpace the benefits of new power sources.
  • The birthplace of “green building” was Austin, influencing global sustainability practices.
  • Adjusting incentives based on actual conservation results refines green programs.
  • Remodeling leverages existing infrastructure for environmental and carbon footprint benefits.
  • Design choices at the base of the energy pyramid have lasting impacts.
  • High-tech green solutions may underperform compared to simple design changes.
  • Solar technology requires maintenance that may deter widespread adoption.
  • Client education in green building can lead to more sustainable lifestyle choices.
  • Strategic home orientation is a simple yet powerful energy-saving measure.

QUOTES:

  • “Austin is the star in the center of Texas."
  • "Saving energy is much less expensive than building a new power plant."
  • "The oldest and most established green building program in the world is Austin’s."
  • "It’s always better to remodel a house…than it is to build a new house out in the hinterlands."
  • "You can’t air-condition your neighborhood; you want to air-condition your home only."
  • "The single most expensive strategies are still the least effective."
  • "Do green by design before you get into green by gizmo."
  • "I learned why they call them active solar systems…you have to actively participate in their maintenance."
  • "If you’re interested in starting off with an energy-efficient home…look for a lot or home on an east-west running street."
  • "By making it a two-story house we can probably save you 30 percent on your energy bills.”

HABITS:

  • Prioritizing energy efficiency in home and appliance purchases.
  • Regularly maintaining solar panels for optimal performance.
  • Seeking tax benefits through donation of deconstructable materials.
  • Educating oneself on sustainable design before home renovations.
  • Considering environmental impact when planning new construction projects.
  • Implementing passive design elements like window shading for energy savings.
  • Choosing home locations based on optimal solar orientation for efficiency.
  • Opting for reasonable ceiling heights to reduce air conditioning needs.
  • Advocating for green design over reliance on technological gadgets.
  • Analyzing cost-effectiveness and payback periods for green investments.

FACTS:

  • Austin’s Energy Star program inspired the federal Energy Star initiative.
  • The city doubled in size before needing a new power source due to the program.
  • Austin’s green building program was the first of its kind in North America.
  • The program saves more money by incentivizing energy savings than building plants.
  • Green building encompasses reduced consumption, health improvement, and environmental impact reduction.
  • The Austin Green Building Program adjusts incentives based on effectiveness feedback.
  • Proper solar orientation and shading can significantly reduce energy consumption.
  • Donating deconstructed materials can provide significant tax deductions for homeowners.

REFERENCES:

  • Austin Energy Star program
  • South Texas nuclear power plant
  • US Green Building Council’s LEED program
  • USDA food guide pyramid
  • Habitat for Humanity
  • Better Homes and Gardens

RECOMMENDATIONS:

  • Consider home orientation for natural cooling before installing air conditioning.
  • Donate deconstructable materials to charities for tax benefits and sustainability.
  • Prioritize passive design elements over high-tech solutions for energy savings.
  • Educate clients on sustainable design choices for long-term environmental benefits.
  • Choose two-story designs over expansions for better energy efficiency at home.
  • Maintain solar panels regularly to ensure their long-term effectiveness and savings.